Speaker 1: 0:01

The, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, so, so. So we have before us the opportunity to forge, for ourselves and for future generations, a new world order. Good evening folks. You're listening to the hour of the time. I'm. William cooper is against the wall. The chair is against the wall. John has a long mustache. John has a long mustache. It's 12 o'clock, americans, another day closer to victory, and for all of you out there, on or behind the lines, this is your song. Veteran of three foreign wars, entrepreneur and warrior, poet, tony arbor, and takes on the issues facing our country, civilization and planet. This is the arbor radio transmission. Harder Burn Radio Transmission. He was in charge of the clattering train I had to wait for that intro to die down.

Speaker 2: 2:57

I was thinking about a poem today. I was talking to David Knight on his show. We were talking about Winston Churchill and I know I've done this before here on the program. But these are just extraordinary times, ladies and gentlemen. We're watching the controlled demolition of the world economy, starting with our own, and this is creative destruction. Uh, this is a a strategy, not a transparent. We're going to get into this today. This isn't after last week and after last week's show I had a lot of emails and people reaching out and saying you know that history lesson that you gave us on tariffs. It was really good and I appreciated that and I thought about it afterwards and I said I don't know that that's relevant. Because I don't know that that's relevant, because I don't think that's what's going on. We're going to dig in to that for sure today, because the more that I talk to smart people like David Knight, the more that I studied the markets, the more that I look at see what's happened.

Speaker 2: 3:55

This whipsaw back and forth Like we went through this liberation day. Liberation Day, I was thinking of that poem. Who is in charge of the clattering train? The axles creep and the couplings strain. The pace is hot and the points are near. Sleep is dead in the driver's ear and the signals flash through the night in vain, for death is in charge of the clattering train. That was Winston Churchill's favorite poem and he memorized that when he was a kid and when I was a young soldier in Iraq I read like 200 books. I read the William Manchester's biographies on Churchill with about two or three others. So I'm well-versed in that.

Speaker 2: 4:45

And as we start looking at this ramp up to another unnecessary, unconstitutional, satanic war in the Middle East, it has nothing to do with American security. I'm going to dig into that today. I wanted to remind everybody the Middle East was drawn up by Winston Churchill drinking a glass of scotch after World War. I Seriously, these are artificial lines, these are maps that are just drawn up. These are constructs of a bygone era, different fading empires, and we're about to cross a boundary that may not be able to stop the consequences once they kick off. You know watching you should be alarmed, and I don't want to. I also think there's a lot of good things and opportunities happen. So I want to paint that.

Speaker 2: 5:37

But at the same time, this whole thing with the tariffs and the whipsaw and the back and forth and a direct conflict. This is trade wars and currency wars, followed by actual wars and this blanket set of tariffs that were set off the market tanked. Now we're setting back Liberation Day 90 days except for one, except for China. And let me tell you something, folks China was given everything that they have. We gave it to them on purpose. So if we built up China on purpose, if you go back to 1972 when Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger opened China, it's a huge move.

Speaker 2: 6:23

I mean, the teleprompter hairdo idiots today in mainstream media don't know this history. I don't think they know any history, but they don't know that history. It was a moonscape. You read Pat Buchanan's book. Pat was with Nixon when he went to China, and it was. It had nuclear weapons in 1964. That is true.

Speaker 2: 6:48

But it was a very backward nation, a very gray. It was like you know it was. Everything was uh, there was no again. There was a lot of order, but there was no hustle and bustle, there was no life to it. That's what it's about Buchanan. He called it a moonscape. You realize the wealth and the technology that was given to them on purpose.

Speaker 2: 7:14

Because what happens if you look at the timeline. It's really important that you pay attention to this, because politics will suck you into a false narrative. I've talked about the allegory of Plato's cave before. You think you're watching something, but you're actually watching something else. You're going to choose a team, but there is really no team for you. You can choose a principle, you can choose something that you believe in, but partisanship and where we are right now in this country with all this, it's nonsense, because there's something else in the periphery. I'm going to explain this to you.

Speaker 2: 7:50

We opened China in 72. And again backwards, they didn't even have communication with us, we didn't have diplomatic ties with China. So we opened China, huge move. So we opened China, huge move. And 1973, the next year, that was the birth of the Trilateral Commission, zygmunt Brzezinski, the Rockefellers, which is basically it's like the next step up to get the trilateralist and it's technocrats and those who believe that the transference of the West into the East would be necessary for the technocratic world order, because the Chinese and those in Asia are better at implementing those control systems.

Speaker 2: 8:45

You understand that the Rockefellers and Rothschilds set up Mao's China in 1949, the same way that the Warburgs and the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers set up the communist state of the Soviet Union, the Bolshevik Revolution, in 1917. That was set up by the bankers as well. So they set up Mouse China. This is a long-term plan. Because of their population, because of their resources and because of the way that the government is structured, they could create that, to create this system. They've been playing with it. The prototype for the new world order that the super elite, klaus Schwabian, lizard folk want to create was that the proto system was the Soviet Union. Okay, that's why it was set up by the world's richest people.

Speaker 2: 9:30

I know that if you're listening to this and you and you'd have this, you know, uh, black and white court historian taught mind frame, then you think that you know it's the 20th century, was capitalism versus communism? That's not true. That's again. That is the Plato's cave. That's the thing that you're supposed to see, but not what actually is. And the timeline for China 73 is a trilateral commission. 74, the United States runs its last trade surplus ever. That's what built the country. We would never have been able to bail the British out of two world wars, which we did right, or rather the banking houses, they're all the same. We bailed them out of two world wars that they started, by the way. So we would never have been able to do that had we been a consumptive nation, a consuming nation and a debtor nation, instead of a creditor nation and a production nation. We did. We reversed all of those policies, starting post-world war ii and then accelerating the opening of china, the birth of the trilaterals.

Speaker 2: 10:34

And you have nafta. Ross perot called it the giant sucking sound. Like I said it's going to be a giant sucking sound. That's what it was, and it's all those jobs and manufacturing. Everything just sifted down to places like Mexico and there was offshore to China, free trade policies or creative destructions. What's the? The goal of that is I talked about that last week with, you know, karl Marx supporting free trade. That's what it's for. It's to hasten the revolution and it builds antagonism between working people and the super elite, or at least the controllers. Right, they like that antagonism. They think that it's, you know, the money class it's, or the people that are successful is doing to them. You know it's the top, top tier, one percent, and that's who's pushing that policy. So you had nafta and all the.

Speaker 2: 11:21

While we're building up china, we're sending them technology, or the. We're giving technology to the israelis who sell it to the chinese. And we know about it missile technology, military technology, manufacturing, trade secrets, all that stuff. That's it and it's being filtered. By the end of the 20th century. You have china being put into the World Trade Organization. I believe that was 99.

Speaker 2: 11:56

And then, going into post-9-11 world, the Bush administration gives China most favored nation trading status, actually 90 days to the day of 9-11. So it's December 11, 2001. After that, america lost 55,000 factories. One in three manufacturing jobs disappeared. The Bush administration actually, to offset the bleeding, the absolute hemorrhaging of economic health and wealth on the system, they counted fast food workers as manufacturing because they were building sandwiches.

Speaker 2: 12:35

You can go look that up. That's real, that's how much we lost, and so you can cover it up and you can paper it up for a while with fake money. You print it, you print it and you don't really notice. It buys less and less. Why does the price of gold go from $280 an ounce in 1999 to $3,100 an ounce in 2025? Well, you just should just get some stocks and just hang on to stock. Okay, because it's a monetary metal. You're losing all that purchasing power. That's what's happening when they're building up this fragile fake economy. Meanwhile, trade secrets, jobs, infrastructure, technology, all that stuff flowing eastward.

Speaker 2: 13:24

I've got an article I'm going to bring up on Taiwan too, before the show ends. But I wanted to open with this because this whole Liberation Day chaos. There's something else underlying this and it could be. People have said well, trump wants to create a recession so he can force the Fed to lower rates, so we can have happy days are here again and the stock market has this temporary boon. There's a lesson in that. That's unsustainable.

Speaker 2: 13:56

First of all, that's not economic health, that's a sugar high and you have 125 percent. I know this is a lot to follow on facts and figures, but it's a lot to cover, especially since the mainstream is not going to do any of this kind of analysis. We have 125% of debt to GDP, so that means that the gross domestic product of the United States, 125% of the debt to the gross domestic product, that's production. No currency ever survives. You can't operate a government at 130. History shows that and we've reached close to that during times like World War II. But it's usually like 40%, 35%, not 125, 130%. But that's where we're going. We're going to go to 130 debt to gdp ratio, meanwhile trying to get rates lowered, pushing out new currency into the system, all that stuff. So this is like some back you know, backdoor machiavellian move. Supposedly that's what the you know backdoor Machiavellian move. Supposedly that's what the MAGA people tell me If I'm watching things on X and the, the um that I should trust the plan or it's the art of the deal.

Speaker 2: 15:13

There's a lot more going on than whatever this surface level stuff is. We gave China everything, do you understand? We gave them everything on purpose. Start asking yourself that question. I brought this up on tinfoil hat in December and I think I'm probably the only person that did like this. Notice this and you'll start. I'm going to say something. You're going to notice it now. Notice when they throw out the term. You'll have these Republicans come out and they'll throw out the term China hawk. What the hell is a China hawk? When did you hear that? During the time of Paul Ryan, speaker of the House of Wisconsin.

Speaker 2: 16:02

Eddie Munster, this horrible, horrible human being, a dead-souled automaton for Lucifer. It's just an awful, awful shill, globalist shill. He loved the idea of this globalization of free trade. Matter of fact, they had something called the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Anybody remember TPP? It was the follow-up to NAFTA. By the way, it actually legalized slavery in certain nations like India. Now you can look this up. I've been doing this for years.

Speaker 2: 16:37

But one of the cool things about the Republican Party back then right, really cool is they wouldn't let you read the bill, like if you're going to vote on it. In Congress we love free trade so much and we love bolstering up and putting China. We love them so much that you couldn't read the bill. You had to go into a basement of the Capitol and they watched you and you could go through it. You couldn to go into a basement of the Capitol and they watched you and you could go through it. You couldn't take copies out so you couldn't take it home. You couldn't have your staff look over it to vote on the damn thing, and he wouldn't allow debate on the bill either. Now, to his credit, when Trump took office, he killed that. It was day one that he did that. He killed the TPP. It fractured, but all the globalization continued. It was just another deal on top of a deal, and the reason I bring that up is because back then this was 2015.

Speaker 2: 17:34

You didn't have this term China hawk. They've literally made it up. You realize they created it so they could have an adversary. Russia doesn't really work. It loses 2 million people a year in net population. Their economy doesn't really grow larger than, say, the state of Texas as a GDP. They're a nuclear-armed country, but it's hard to make that the left does a pretty good job at making them the boogeyman. That's like the Goldilocks War for the left, they want to have war with Russia because it's seen as anti LGBTQP, whatever. And then the right wants war with Iran because of Israel. But the the china thing is is a new thing, and this war that we're having, like this is the.

Speaker 2: 18:29

The consequences of the election is we're having this. You can see the whole purpose. I think I'm starting to think now. It wasn't about jobs, it wasn't about infrastructure for the United States, it's not even about income. This is to start this game and we've been playing it to have this direct conflict with China as a boogeyman, because then you can blame it on China on everything. You can blame it on the loss of the purchasing power of the dollar, the collapse of the dollar. You can blame economic setbacks. You can blame anything on the other, but never forget we gave it to them and the Republican Party is more responsible than anything any entity for giving it all away, pawning America's soul.

Speaker 2: 19:15

At least there were some Democrats who opposed NAFTA. I knew one of them very personally, one of the old blue dog Democrats I've got his sign up here in my office is Ralph Hall. It's a good friend of mine. He opposed NAFTA, one of the last ones. But all the Republican party has supported globalization. They, I used to hear and I probably still do there was advertisements on talk radio, conservative talk about investing in China and all that stuff. They built China up, but now you have China hawks and that's the tell. There's something gross about that. There's something so off-putting when your mind actually still works and I know I'm supposed to be anesthetized with fluoride and zombified by mainstream media, but I see right through that and at least I don't talk like this.

Speaker 2: 20:13

Let's take you to this article, just real quick. This is how delusional we have become. Let's get into this. We're going to put this article up on the screen. First of all. You look at the headlines of Drudge and it's got a weather vane showing Trump pointing. It's a weather vane. Which way are we going?

Speaker 2: 20:42

The MAGA is never you never go full partisan. It's kind of like. It's kind of like Tropic Thunder, right, you never go full partisan. Let's put this up here. This is the kind of rhetoric that comes out. And when market term, people are wiped out like their 401ks, their, their iras, their holdings. You know from all this, just uncertainty. Markets hate uncertainty, but I tell you what I hate more than that is, uh, brain dead partisanship. It says that this is msn.

Speaker 2: 21:22

By the way, it says after President Donald Trump's tariff pledge last week sent stock prices plunging, the pro-Trump influencer, benny Johnson, offered his three million followers. Do you understand the price you pay for not joining these teams? It is as an entrepreneur. It's excruciating. Three million followers Well, at least I'm interesting. I feel like the scene on Good Will Hunting. You know, I got everything for $1.35 in late fees at the library and you spent hundreds of thousands, so maybe I didn't have to give up my soul to do this. But 3 million followers. He gave them a rosy perspective on the news. He says losing money costs you nothing. In fact, it builds quite a bit of character. Eight months earlier, on a down trading day under president joe biden, johnson struck a darker tone. It's bloody black monday, holy moly. The kamala harrah crash is here.

Speaker 2: 22:34

See, this is what I'm talking about and I just wanted to bring that up just as a quick example of understanding what you're actually watching, which this is almost nothing to do with redoing American manufacturing. The Rust Belt's rusty for a reason. It's been shut down for years. That's a long-term build. You have to incentivize companies and investment into this country. You have to take and slash the corporate income tax to country. You have to take the and slash the corporate income tax to zero. You have to make tax-free zones. This is like we have to have a Marshall plan for ourselves. You just can't just throw up tariffs and expect for people to start moving back. So that's not what that's about this.

Speaker 2: 23:23

As soon as all the things start dropping away, this is to have a tension, kinetic tension with china, and not that you used to look at this. I'm not defending china. They do horrific. I mean they are a police state. They're basically a mass grave. I mean, if you look at the history of, mao had killed like grave. I mean, if you look at the history, mao had killed like 70 million people. If you look at their, they had a civil war about the same time that the united states had a civil war. We had like 600 000 dead. You know, make it. You know, 102 or 300 more thousand wounded. All this, I mean it's a pretty big number. It was the bloodiest war in the 19th century for the West, but I think the Chinese Civil War had like 40 million. It was some insane number. Like it's a massive number for the 19th century. They have a large population. That's just how they are. And Napoleon said that China was a sleeping dragon. Better let it slumber, best to let it slumber.

Speaker 2: 24:27

Well, the globalists woke it up 1972, and this was in anticipation of the start of the Trilateral Commission. Folks, this is a completely different history than what this isn't. America versus China. This is a plan to reshape the globe in the image of the globalist, the technocratic elite. They're playing a sophisticated game. This is like using politics and using surface-level information against you.

Speaker 2: 24:56

See, if you listen to my show and maybe I'm not obviously I leave a possibility that I'm wrong on everything and you should not trust me ever. If I say something, go look it up and verify it. If I'm wrong, send it. And you should not trust me ever. If I say something, go look it up and verify it. If I'm wrong, send it to me, I'll correct it. This is all you know. This is my best guess, because things are.

Speaker 2: 25:13

You have to look at this. You don't get to that level of where you are like who runs the country. You don't get to be president if you're just like, oh yeah, put tariffs on it. No, no, just bring them down. No, and raise them up and then do that. I mean it's, there's a larger thing at play here, so you have to suss out what is that? But at least we're not. If you're listening, this least you're not in that camp of whatever three million followers. That guy, just partisan, and it is where ideas and integrity go to die. All right, I'm going to skip over Liberation Day. We talked enough about tariffs and that remains to be seen. Yeah, and just a little bit, mike.

Speaker 2: 26:03

Even Kitco over on Kitco News, the worst, most consequential self-inflicted wound in US economic policy since World War II, own goal in 70 years. They jeopardize the united states ability to sell debt from security alliances and conduct economic and foreign policy, according to former us treasury treasury secretary, larry summers. Well, I don't have to really. I mean, larry summers is not somebody I'm looking to for advice or to follow, but on this one he's. He's throwing out something that is, I think, worth a talking point, which is why it wasn't necessary to throw out this shock to the system. Which is why you're watching the next headline, so you want to know the next shooter drop.

Speaker 2: 26:54

That's going to be the investigations on insider trading, like the pump and dump. Do you understand the level of blood in the streets when the markets go down that far, that fast, and there's a panic and a sell-off? Well, if you know that in advance kind of like the people, kind of like Deutsche Bank and offshoots of that had direct knowledge of you know there's millions that are still unclaimed from shorts that were put on airline stocks before 9-11. Shorts that were put on airline stocks before 9-11, and those banks that held some of the trades had ties to intelligence. I'm just saying there's a, there's an over. I think there's wisdom here. When you look at the amount of damage that was done and then the swift turnaround because all it takes is a we got a 90-day reprieve Things start to rise again. So, bottom back up to the top. Gold held off really well. By the way, we'll talk a little bit about that too.

Speaker 2: 27:56

I was on with David Knight just talking about gold's metrics since 2020. The Larry Summers is right here. This is a self-inflicted wound and you have to ask yourself why. Why'd they do that? All right, let's. Let's go check the chat over on. If you want to chat, you can check out the. You can check out the America Unplugged channel over on Rumble. So what is that? Krp27? Yeah, someone near and dear to me listens to that Benny Johnson. Oh well that's. I don't understand that level of partisanship. I just can't. I can't. That's not analysis to me, that's just clicks and you know that is being acceptable.

Speaker 2: 28:57

All that kind of stuff, I can't stand it. Let's see Knights of the Storm is in the chat. Let's see Nights of the storm is in the chat. Uh, brad, be back, that's cool. Uh, harps is in the chat. Thank y'all for being here. I appreciate it. Yes, we're, we're working on the chat. Since we got dumped by uh Rockfin.

Speaker 2: 29:20

I, you know I could get into all the places that I've been banned from and I'm not even controversial, am I that bad? But I get taken off of channels. Isn't that terrible, youtube? You got to be careful. I'm not on YouTube except for the Wise Wolf Show, but I can't do my normal stuff over there. All right, let's get back into some headlines and history here. All right, let's get back into some uh headlines in history here. Uh, I'm going to. I want to come back to uh, china and Taiwan. Let's do that last, and then we may have something on the uh sociological front that I found interesting. Uh, hopefully we can get time to to cover that. Oh, there's just so much going on on the sociological front that I found interesting. Hopefully we get time to cover that. There's just so much going on Again, that's what I always say when the major headline hits, you've got to ask yourself what else is out there, what else?

Speaker 2: 30:16

is actually going on, because that's the real threat. All right, let's stop screen and put this one up. I want to talk about this. I want to dig into the how and the why. This is antiwarcom.

Speaker 2: 30:33

Trump again threatens to attack Iran. Suggests Israel could lead it. Iran's president reaffirmed on Wednesday that Tehran does not seek a nuclear weapon and said Khomeini wasn't opposed to US investment. On Wednesday, president Trump again threatened the possibility of the US taking military action against Iran and suggested Israel might lead the attack If it requires military. We were going to have military, trump told reporters in the Oval Office when asked if the US would attack if a nuclear deal isn't reached with Iran, israel will obviously be very much involved in that. I'll be the leader of that, but nobody leads us. We do what we want to do. Well, israel is only involved in that insofar as they have a very powerful lobby and they get us to go to war on their behalf. They have a very it's AIPAC, they have a very powerful lobby and that's just historical fact.

Speaker 2: 31:40

I was in several Middle Eastern countries and I never saw an Israeli troop. I was in several Middle Eastern countries and I never saw an Israeli troop. They have one of the. It was the third largest army as far as military strongest in the world. It's really powerful. They've got air force, they've got ground forces, top-notch intelligence with Mossad.

Speaker 2: 32:01

They have all that but they don't really ever have to use it because they got us you know we go and send uh al-qaeda, you know, bomb uh the syrian government and use al-qaeda proxies and isis proxies to take out their government. Or you know we'll go in and same thing in iraq. We know we'll go in and use the our infrastructure to cause chaos in the region and destabilize that, because that's really what threatens Israel is nation states. You know 1967, the Six-Day War, the Yom Kippur War in 1973, this is what threatens Israel. That are nation states. It's not the PLO, it's not Hamas that they set up. By the way, it's funny, I've not said one thing. That's not a fact.

Speaker 1: 32:52

It's just not popular.

Speaker 2: 32:55

Yeah, that's what we do, and if you step, you're so inundated with. This is necessary, but the lesson that we have given over the years and, by the way, a nuclear weapon is an old technology, it's 80 years Pakistan has a nuclear weapon, india has a nuclear weapon, north Korea has a nuclear weapon. They only have a $40 billion GDP, by the way, they have a nuclear weapon. It's an 80-year-old technology, folks. But the lesson that we gave to the world was if you don't have one, you better get one, because we'll invade you if you don't. That's what we do we topple regimes. What's the latest from Gaddafi regimes? What's the latest from Gaddafi, you know? Once a US ally. Now same thing with Bashar al-Assad and his family. Once a Cold War US ally, not useful anymore because you're growing pretty strong. It's best just to have chaos in the region. You know, or you might have ties to. You know, hezbollah, maybe because you're Shia, so that's not good. And Hezbollah has ties to those who oppose Israel. Again, it all tracks back to that and that's why we're all constantly inundated in the Middle East. It's about chaos taking out nation-states.

Speaker 2: 34:28

Trump's latest threat comes ahead of negotiations between the US and Iran that will be held in Oman this Saturday. The talks will be attended by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragaki Is that right? And Trump's Middle East envoy, steve Wyckoff? Trump has insisted the talks will be direct negotiations. Talks will be direct negotiations, while Al-Gharqi has said they will be indirect, meaning Omani and mediators will pass messages between the two sides. Reports have said that Iran will need a goodwill gesture from the US to hold direct talks, such as the removal of some sanctions, but the Trump administration continues to impose sanctions.

Speaker 2: 35:18

I told a story earlier today on the David Knight Show. It's a 22-year-old Tony in Afghanistan. I got a call. I said Arterburn, we need you to do security. There's a VIP coming and you're going to just take a trip. You're going to get on the tarmac, you're going to fly around. I said okay, and it was like five of us and we went out. I went to the tarmac I was getting on the back of the ramp of the C-130, and I turn around and there's Black Beret, four stars. It's Tommy Franks. Anybody knows anything about the lead-up to the Iraq War and Afghanistan?

Speaker 1: 35:59

It was.

Speaker 2: 36:00

Tommy Franks, leader of CENTCOM. He looked at me and you can't salute on the tarmac because you don't know if there's snipers.

Speaker 1: 36:08

So you don't salute.

Speaker 2: 36:10

I just stood at attention and and said, where are you from? And I said I'm. I knew he's from texas. I'm from texas like you, sir. He said, well, good, I'm not worried anymore. So we got on. We got on the plane and flew around and it was two f-16s, one on each wing. I was like I'm most relaxed I've ever been on a plane in my life, like this plane isn't going to get shot down.

Speaker 2: 36:48

We flew out to all a meme that floats around and it says why does Iran Iran wants war with us. Why do they keep built, why do they put their country so close to our military bases? I mean, just literally surround them. And if you watch movies like W by Oliver Stone, the Dick Cheney character puts it on a map. You guys should go watch this. The Dick Cheney character puts it on the map and shows you the reason, what they really want.

Speaker 2: 37:15

So the neocons, the warmongers, they're just great deceivers too. They fooled so many people in politics, americans, especially Christians. Unfortunately, next time you hear if you listen to me long enough, you can't get that way anymore, because you'll hear him, you'll hear the rhetoric and you're like, oh, you're just full of it, you don't really care about the things I care about, you just want war. Like Max boot is one of them, like you know he'll. I could tell you guys so many stories about conservative talk radio, cause I was in it for years and now I just quit. I mean, I just went and did my own. I'm on WWCR, I'll always keep a transmission, but I could tell you about how fake and how much of a game it is.

Speaker 2: 38:10

But Iran is at the center of that. It's always been a push, especially in those circles, and you got to ask yourself why Iran doesn't threaten the United States. In what way? Have you ever really thought that through? Like what? How are they going to get? Are they going to invade us? Can they get here? What are they going to? Like use bass, boats and stuff. They don't even have a navy. I mean they have like a small thing, like a contingent. They don't have the.

Speaker 2: 38:41

I mean, if the Nazis couldn't do it, folks, if the Third Reich who had like technology, if they had? You know we were racing at the end of the war to get their scientists because they had some of the smartest people on the planet. We wanted to make sure that we got them before the Russians did. It was like I, our Nazis are better than your Nazis. That's what they were doing. They couldn't get us, they couldn't attack us. So what is this all about? That's exactly what I just told you. It was it's resources, it's israel, it's military industrial complex, it's all the things. It's a hobby horse, you know. Trump has been increasing sanctions on iran and threatening the country over its nuclear program, even though US intelligence agencies recently reaffirmed that there's no evidence Tehran is building a bomb.

Speaker 2: 39:45

It's kind of like I took place part uh tail end of the invasion of Iraq and I remember rolling in and we didn't you know where's our chem gear. You know, like we didn't have the top rate chemical gear. So I thought they were. I thought they had stockpiles of all this stuff. Where's all the you know for for one on Iraq with sarin gas and other thing, nerve agents and other stuff? Well, we we know that they had a certain amount of it, because we gave it to them to kill Iranians. And you have to understand too that a lot of this Iran stuff is in direct correlation with Russia too. That's why it's so dangerous. It's not just this thing, this entity that exists unto itself and if we hit it, it stands. There's consequences. I mean, when we went to have our conferences with Stalin in World War II, it was in Tehran. At a Tehran conference, stalin, churchill, fdr that's where Stalin wanted to meet.

Speaker 2: 41:06

I'll tell you a story quick too. It's just a little bit of history fun there was at Potsdam after the war. You had Harry Truman, you had Winston Churchill and you had Stalin, and they were all just carving up the world. Basically, it was the end of World War II in Europe and they were carving up the territories. Who's going to be involved? And what are the Russians going to help with the invasion of Japan? All that stuff. And then Churchill, being the leader of Great Britain, wanted certain concessions and he had a certain amount of leverage and he was talking so they all stayed up and they just drank and drank. Drinking vodka was Stalin and amount of leverage. And he was talking saying they all stayed up and they just drank and drank.

Speaker 2: 42:00

you know, drinking vodka with stalin and churchill drank too much and, uh, he woke up his head hurting and he just had a panic and he said, oh, I don't remember, you know. So he jots off a note to go to stalin. He's like, oh, you know, premier stalin, you know I, uh, I hope you had a hope we had. You know, we can continue our talks. I would love to go over everything that was said and reaffirm or, you know, um, just familiarize ourself with it, because he didn't realize, he didn't remember what he said so he sends the note over and he gets a

Speaker 2: 42:26

note back and uh, stalin says uh, don't worry, winston, I was drunk too and the translator's been shot. So you know there's a reason that Iran and I talked about. Why am I talking about Churchill today? I don't know, he's not even one of my favorites, he's just an interesting guy. He's an interesting warmonger he was. But that's a direct link. There's a little bit of history there on Russia and Iran. We do at least one more article. I've got some folks in the chat too. Make sure I'm not missing anybody. Oh, we got BitSource AML solution. I know those guys.

Speaker 1: 43:14

Todd, how are you?

Speaker 2: 43:15

guys, good to see you. Yeah, if you criticize the bombing of Palestinian children, they simply call you their, created Hamas, and then they walk away from the argument. Saddam Hussein same thing trained the school of Americas and installed in 1979. Yeah, they installed Saddam Hussein in 79, tim Osman, which is bin Laden, and they also installed that was the 1979 was the 444 days of Americans held hostage by the Iranian regime, the Ayatollah. And if you recall, the reason that they had that revolution in Iran is because we installed the Shah back in the 1950s with Operation Ajax, with the overthrow of Mosaddegh.

Speaker 2: 44:05

Every time we've done this, it just turns out really bad. We get into these situations and remember it just turns out really bad. We get into these situations and remember the thing with Iran goes back to the Cold War, so it's not just an Israeli thing, but that's why we're still there, that's why we have so much heat on it. That's good to see you, todd, thanks for being in the chat. Okay, let's do the last article of the day. Let's do a little bit of history too. Parapolitics and precious metals one of my favorite things to talk about. All right, let's do natural news I found this earlier and just key points, some history you may not know, especially as we're. This is a direct correlation with the conversation we were having earlier about China and the tariffs and the trade war and the asymmetrical war, and what you're actually watching unfold. It is quite possible, folks, that the technocrats literally had this as a long-term plan to set up an enemy, to have a new enemy, and the testing ground the social credit score, the CBDC. That's China. The testing ground for the technocratic new world order that they want so bad. That is China. Natural news China's Taiwan invasion could come sooner than expected, as experts warn of imminent military strike.

Speaker 2: 45:58

China may invade taiwan within six months using military drills as invasion rehearsals. Taiwan's semiconductor dominance makes global supply chains vulnerable to severe disruption. China's military tests prefabricated invasion barges, oh, signaling rapid strike capabilities. Biden's open border policy could allow China to exploit US domestic vulnerability during a crisis. I'm just reading some key points here. A 2027 invasion could overwhelm Taiwan before US forces respond, requiring immediate preparedness. It's requiring immediate preparedness.

Speaker 2: 46:31

Well, for those of you who don't know the history and I don't consider myself an expert on this, but I mentioned this earlier In 1949, we lose mainland China to the communist forces of Mao Zedong, and, of course, mao Zedong and the communists are always supported by the wealthiest people in the world, as communism is, and they create the communist state and the nationalist forces under Chiang Kai-shek flee to a place called Formosa, which is Taiwan. And so Taiwan was this Cold War ally for the United States, cold War ally for the United States. And, as a matter of fact, the next year when South Korea was invaded by North Korea, the communists invaded the South. When they were invaded and MacArthur was called to respond, macarthur was in Japan, general Douglas MacArthur, and he was going to oversee the counterstrike and, you know, free south korea from the communist. He kept threatening to release chang because he had chang, had all these you know nationalist forces there on formosa, which is again taiwan. They never did, but that was until 1972. That's what I'm saying. This is such a huge pivot. So if you were a cold warrior, if you, you know, were a rock rib right winger, uh, opening up China in 72, the Democrats could have never done it.

Speaker 2: 47:59

It took Nixon. It was an anti-communist. You know his entire career. He brought down Alger Hiss and been part of the house on American activities committee, all that stuff. As a Congressman. You know he, he had the kitchen debate with Khrushchev, he got that famous picture. I need to get that picture of Nixon putting his finger in Khrushchev's lapel. That's such a great iconic photo, but it took Nixon opening it up. I mean it would take that right. It took an anti-communist to get that done.

Speaker 2: 48:29

To get that done, and after we opened China officially, something very strange started to happen. That's when the United States government started to back off of its support of Taiwan. As a matter of fact, kissinger and Nixon gave Chairman Mao a verbal promise I'd say a verbal understanding that there was a one China, there was one China, not two Chinas, and that eventually it would be a real. This was implied. It wasn't put into writing. So this is the beginning of the post-gold standard United States. When we went off the gold standard opened China the next year, and then we have the trilateral commission. It's very important to understand this history because this is the beginning of the technocratic age. If you also look at things like the space races, races 72 is the last year we went into space or did anything. I'm not well, I guess, if you, we go in the atmosphere but if the last time we went into went to the moon?

Speaker 2: 49:40

or did any exploration if you believe that right if you even believe that beside the fact that's, that's not what we. We don't do that anymore. We just continue to offshore things. We build up infrastructure of other nations and we have a fiat centered economy here like debt ridden and all that stuff. So over time we start seeding things, not only the manufacturing and technology and secrets and other things that go to.

Speaker 2: 50:12

You can look at the years of the Clinton White House and it was just Google like bags of cash. They would give the Chinese officials bags of cash. No, the Chinese officials would give us bags of cash for missile technology. There's a lot of that going on in the 90s because it was just like this arc. You know, it didn't seem like it was ever going to. We'll never get overtaken by, you know, china economically. Of course we did, because we gave them everything. I mean, it's a layup, we literally just handed them everything. So we did that. But I want to bring to your attention. There's a document that came out on January 1st 1979. And it makes all of this look really strange and this will happen. More than likely there will be a conflict of some kind before the decade's out. China will make a move here on Taiwan and it may be pre-planned that we have this as some sort of pretext.

Speaker 2: 51:25

but that's what the document was a verbal understanding, a memo from Zygmunt Brzezinski, the Secretary of State for Jimmy Carter at the time, recognizing a one-China policy and cutting off diplomatic ties with Taipei. So we abandoned Taiwan on January 1st 1979. On January 1st 1979. So you fast forward now and we're looking at not only we've given billions into Taiwan, but we've reversed our own reversal. The article goes on to say as tensions between the US and China reach a boiling point, some defense experts warn that Beijing may be preparing for an invasion of Taiwan within the next six months, others citing 2027, using aggressive gray zone warfare tactics disguised as military exercises. Stakes couldn't be higher. Taiwan's dominance in semiconductor production means global supply chains, us military readiness and consumer electronics would face unprecedented disruption.

Speaker 2: 52:56

Meanwhile, china's belligerent posturing and the fallout from the Biden-American War, and even predating that let's just go to the Spanish-American War, giant newspapers which fueled American narrative in the 19th and early 20th century. What did William Randolph Hearst tell his photographer and paint the guy who would go out, go down and create cartoons and other drawings to show what's happening in places, like when they had the in Cuba. And William Randolph Hearst told him you supply me the images and I'll supply the war. And then you, right after that, you had the explosion where the main, the main was sunk the ship, the naval ship for the United States, which Spain had nothing to do with, but that was the battle cry. Remember, the main to hell was Spain. And we take Cuba and then we take the.

Speaker 2: 54:01

Philippines and Guam. You know the go to the Manila Bay and Harbor and sink those old Spanish wooden ships. But that was a concocted, manufactured war Started by a false flag. It's later been determined that it was basically an on-purpose setup for the main to hit whatever. It hit mine or something. But it wasn't Spanish, it was a pretext for war. Same thing with World War I.

Speaker 2: 54:38

You have the Archduke Ferdinand murdered by this shadowy group called the Black Hand. It was a Serbius anarchist group that had ties to the British intelligence. British intelligence then starting a series of treaties being tripped like tripwires. Nobody could stop it, even had the Kaiser crying trying to stop the army, because he couldn't even stop it. Even the leaders couldn't stop it once the army started mobilizing. Don't get me started on World War II, so many false flags. I mean you can get into Pearl Harbor too, once the army started mobilizing. Don't get me started on World War II, so many false flags. I mean you can get into Pearl Harbor too. The Gulf of Tonkin, vietnam 1964, I believe Lyndon Johnson just you know deep state had murdered JFK and he's got in driver's seat. Jfk had that memorandum withdrawing the troops from Vietnam and doing a drawdown. There's interviews saying well, in the final analysis, it's their war, it's theirs to win or lose.

Speaker 2: 55:40

And then his head gets blown off in Dealey Plaza. See where this is going. By the way, the commander of the boat in the Gulf of Tonkin was Jim Morrison's dad from the Doors, and that's like the Jim Morrison songs are like the theme song for Vietnam. So history has some weird synchronicities, doesn't it? Same thing with the Gulf War, the original Gulf War, I mean, saddam Hussein was given a green light by our government to invade Kuwait. We got a thumbs up, we armed him, we gave him the weapons, and the Kuwaitis were slant, drilling and taking Iraqi oil and stuff and he said well, this is just a made-up place on a map that Winston Churchill drew up drinking scotch. But then we had our new Hitler. You understand like all these things aren't real. You got to be careful of all this. All the pretext for false flags are written all over this thing.

Speaker 2: 56:43

If you don't know your history, then you're just walking into it blindly. All right, it does talk, talk, I mean there are, we have open border issues, which gives them ample opportunity, all sorts of things. But I think we're to be careful here. I think the wisdom and uh about the tensions with china and what I've called to your attention is the term China hawk Just be really skeptical of whatever the hell that means. The overlords want war and I will never abide by that. There's almost no wars. I mean you have to prepare for war. I'm not a pacifist, matter of fact, I'm harder than you know as far as defense than anybody.

Speaker 2: 57:36

I don't even want to. I don't want our military bogged down in unnecessary, unconstitutional, unwinnable wars. I think it makes it less strong. I think you should have you know. I think we should be taking out narco terrorists on the border. I think we should protect American citizens. You wouldn't I mean for America's enemies, which are mostly inside the walls you would not want me as commander-in-chief, because I'd actually carry out my orders and my duties. I'd die for this country.

Speaker 2: 58:06

I don't know if me politicians, I don't know if I'm looking around the room and scanning and seeing who actually loves the republic. And there's always this external thing, which you've got to be careful of, that they want to call your attention to A pretext for conditioning your mind for colonizing and priming your mind for war. All right, let's check gold prices real quick. Go to gold, to gold priceme, see if it's not. If not, we'll go. You know you can check the price of gold by going to wolfpackgold or going to wisewolfgoldcom. You can check as it has a. Have a ticker on there. Let's see if we can pull that up. Let's do that real quick. I didn't have it. Wolfpackgold Always fun. I'm working on some site improvements too, but I'm so proud of my ticker. Where's my ticker at there we?

Speaker 1: 59:04

go.

Speaker 2: 59:05

Right at the top of the page. Let's stop the screen. Put this one up.

Speaker 1: 59:09

See Wolfpackgold.

Speaker 2: 59:11

Right at the top. There you can get live prices. Oh, we got a nice little pop up there too. Yeah, gold 3,160 luciferian bankster notes per troy ounce, silver 30.90 per troy ounce for the white metal. And gold has really done well in the face of all this market uncertainty, which should be the tell. Ladies and gents, that should be the tell. Much to discuss. I'll be back next week, Be sure and tune into America. I'm plugged on Saturday myself, Billy Ray Valentine and the legendary Don Jeffries. My website is art of burn Dot gold. Be sure to look up. Pair of truthuther, give us a review too. I got a new Paratruther that's going to come out on the Catcher in the Rye and JD Salinger that Mr Anderson and myself did on Sunday. So you guys take care of each other. Thanks for being here. End of transmission.